Let's Get Clients and Lawyers on the Same Team

Recently, I saw an article in a legal publication inunderstanding about what the fees will be, there
which an in-house lawyer was quoted as sayingwill rarely be a fee dispute.
that she had to reduce costs from outside3. If a client has a fee issue, the client should bring
counsel, because otherwise it would come out ofit up immediately. Perhaps there is a simple and
her bonus. Although I am sure that this lawyer isreasonable answer for the bill. In other instances,
dealing with pressures, cost control and otherwise,an adjustment may be appropriate. However, just
that I can only imagine, what struck me was theletting a fee issue simmer unresolved is no good
implication of a somewhat adversarial relationshipfor anyone: It undermines the client's trust in the
between the client and outside counsel.lawyer, probably results in unnecessary personal
After many years in this profession, and despitestress on the part of the client or in-house
the current economic conditions, I hope it has notlawyer, and cannot lead to resolution.
come to that. It seems to me that the focus4. Lawyers do not always need to be on the
should be on providing needed legal services asclock. Of course, I do not bill clients for sending
efficiently as possible to the client, whether thosethem business articles. I look for opportunities to
services are provided by in-house or outsidetake clients to lunch, which provides an
counsel. That result is best achieved when there isopportunity for them to discuss their legal issues
a strong relationship of trust and understandingor whatever is on their mind off the clock. I often
between the lawyer and the client. Although theoffer to provide educational presentations on
lawyer must earn that trust, it is also true thatrelevant legal topics to clients at no cost. If I am
this type of relationship can only happen when theattending an even that may be of interest, I try
client lets the lawyer become part of the team.to make sure that clients are invited. Further, I
In a team based relationship, the lawyer gets toalmost always write a cover letter (no charge)
know about the client's business in detail, thethat accompanies a statement for services
client's approach to legal issues, and the client'srendered. If there has been any significant activity
approach to business issues. As a result, the clientduring the month, I usually try to include a brief
receives added value without paying more. Thestatus report in the letter reminding them about
client does not have to waste time telling mewhat was accomplished in the prior month. I use
about their business or their overall goals, becausethe word "reminding" purposefully; hopefully, the
I already know.client is well-informed before the bill arrives.
There are other ways that an intimate knowledge5. Lawyers need to say thank you to their clients
of a client's business adds value. For instance, Ifor their business and for their trust and
and many other business lawyers read theconfidence. Similarly, although I never think it
business press voraciously almost every day. If Ishould be expected, it sure does feel good when
see an article that I believe will be of value to ayou have worked hard to achieve a good result,
client, I forward it on. Although I try to do this forand the client says thank you for a job well done.
every client, it is certainly much easier to be6. If lawyers are invited to become part of the
attuned to articles of potential interest when youteam, they need to join the team. Lawyers
thoroughly understand the client's business.should look for opportunities to provide added
The least satisfying relationships are, as I havevalue, such as through articles, and, when
written before, where a client treats the lawyerapplicable, through notifying the client of potential
somewhat akin to a fire axe in a glass case:beneficial opportunities or business relationships.
Break glass and use only in the event of an7. Lawyers need to stay involved in their clients'
emergency. I guess some clients think they arework. One of the great frustrations that I hear in
saving money this way. In reality, in the vastthe legal press is that in-house counsel hate
majority of instances, the fire probably could havemeeting with a "relationship" partner about a new
been avoided if the client had called counsel earlier.matter, and then getting shuffled off to someone
Damage control is rarely very satisfying forthey have never met, often a young associate.
anyone.This is probably the root cause of the rebellion at
Other variations of the "fire axe" approach includesome corporate clients who refuse to pay for
not telling the lawyer all of the facts, or providingfirst year associate time. It does not have to be
the relevant documents a drip at a time. Or callingthat way. There are firms that eschew a
with a "quick question" without giving the entireleverage model and where the senior lawyers do
context. Even when one makes every effort tomost of the work, or at least stay involved. This
get the client to avoid these approaches, it is stillapproach brings experience and judgment to the
sometimes difficult to convince people to do whatrelationship and also helps to assure that client
is good for them.expectations are met. One of the things that
Clients probably follow the fire axe and relatedattracted me to my current firm is that it follows
approaches because they think it will save money.this approach.
However, it is doubtful these approaches result in8. If a client is on a tight budget, involve the
any real cost savings (much less optimal provisionlawyer directly in the discussion. Although we
of legal services). It certainly makes it difficult foralways try to work efficiently, there still may be
the lawyer to add any value beyond the narrowopportunities to do the work more efficiently.
issue when used in such a piecemeal fashion. InThere may be work that can be identified as
fact, it is more difficult even to address the"optional." There may be work that the client may
narrow issue when one does not understand thedecide not to do, even though, optimally, it would
big picture.be done. One caveat to the last point: If the client
Of course, relationships of trust and understandingdecides not to do certain work, the client sure
do not happen over night. However, there areshould not blame the lawyer if it later turns out
some things that both lawyers and clients can dothat it should have been done, and should also not
to move the process along.object to an email from the lawyer confirming the
1. Lawyers need to communicate with their clients.decision not to do the work.
I still hear about instances when lawyers do notI do not have all of the answers. I know that
return client calls or answer emails. Frankly, it ishard economic times have strained corporate legal
difficult to believe that this can happen in this daybudgets for businesses of all sizes. But I cannot
and age, but, apparently, some lawyers still dobelieve that, in either the long run or the short
this.run, a confrontational approach between clients
2. Fee issues should be discussed up front andand their counsel or between in-house counsel and
from the outset. If there is a reasonable mutualoutside counsel will help anyone.